Monday 20 May 2013

MPPP defends controversial Moulmein Rise





MPPP defends controversial 27-storey Moulmein project

0 comments

GEORGE TOWN: The Penang Island Municipal Council (MPPP) has come out in defence of the controversial 27-storey Moulmein Rise luxury suites project in Pulau Tikus and will carry on as planned despite the ongoing online signature petition campaign by non-governmental organisation Citizen Chant Group (Chant) to stop it.

In a press conference earlier, MPPP president Datuk Patahiyah Ismail  questioned the credibility of the ongoing petition, as it was discovered that over 20 councillors, including herself,  had 'protested' against the project.

"On the website, my name, alongside 24 others (names of councillors) were stated on the website. Apparently we have gone against the project, but the truth is, we did not (go against the project)," Patahiyah said.

She, together with other council members showed the press an email received by the Change.org polling site where the petition was being hosted, acknowledging their participation.

"Now, anybody could just enter a name and email and be against the project," Patahiyah said.

On one of the complaints raised by Chant adviser Yan Lee, she said the residents were given ample of time to object as stipulated under the Town and Country Planning Act 1976, saying five objection sessions were held from 2008 to 2011 for those living within the 20m from the site boundary.

She said the five objection sessions were held on Feb 14, 2008 with 19 people attending, Oct 20, 2009 (19), May 25, 2011 (18), July 12 (5) and Aug 16 (1).

Patahiyah defended the council's conversion of the land from commercial to residential and suggested an alternative location for the car park for users of the Pulau Tikus market.

 "More than 50 per cent of the project is already commercial, the remainder was residential so we have decided to rezone the piece of land to commercial status,

"As for the temporary car park, the nearby Axis Complex would serve as a temporary car park with 134 lots for those going to the market," he said.

On the developer 'skirting' the affordable houses requirement, she said the project was not a SoHo (Small office Home office) project but a 'commercial suite', so the developer need not build affordable homes, as required.

Patahiyah allayed fears that the public car park would be taken over by the management committee upon completion, saying that there was a caveat in the planning permission requiring made that the car park should be open for 24 hours.

"We have put a condition, that they need to have a car park on the basement, and the car park must be open for 24 hours," she said.

State local government and traffic management committee chairman Chow Kon Yeow, who was also present, said the developer, who had built the First Avenue mall in town, would deliver a public car park of the same standard.

"The car park would be as good as the one in First Avenue mall. It will be opened in eight or nine months' time and the road users have to bear with the temporary inconvenience while waiting for its completion," he said.

Chow added that the as recommended by the Traffic Impact Assesment study, the Jalan Moulmein stretch to Jalan Pasar would be made into one way to alleviate traffic after the completion of the project.

"In the meantime, we are planning to start off with the one-way system soon, taking account to the heavy traffic during peak hours there," he said.

Meanwhile, Lee, went contacted by the New Straits Times, said he noticed someone had signed the petition using Patahiyah's and other councillors' names.

"I immediately sent emails to Patahiyah, and councillors Lim Mah Hui and Harvinder Singh, which I have spotted in the petitioners' list, in order to verify if they had signed it," he said.

In reaction to Patahiyah's claims, Lee said he would ensure that every single signatory would be independently verified before it was handed over to the council.

The project was in the spotlight after MPPP had given it the green light, and had irked residents and Pulau Tikus Market users who were worried about the traffic build-up and the mammoth structure which would sprout out in the area.

The piece of private land, bounded by the Jalan Moulmein-Jalan Pasar- Lengkok Moulmein, was a former open-air car park serving the business area nearby and the nearby market.

The project, taking place on a land measuring nearly 40,000 sq ft (3,700 sq m), will offer 84 residential units, 27 commercial units with 290 car park bays, and 90 of them public.

Many residents interviewed in the past months felt that the project was too close for comfort, and it had further compounded the lack of parking space problem in Pulau Tikus.



Read more: MPPP defends controversial 27-storey Moulmein project - Latest - New Straits Times http://www.nst.com.my/latest/mppp-defends-controversial-27-storey-moulmein-project-1.240025#ixzz2OHcivE3l

Tuesday 4 December 2012

NST on 87 units per acre

CAP supports Public Consultation



Ppl of Penang CAP supports public consultation

We want public consultation against 87 units per acre.



Introduce public consultation guidelines


alt

CAP is compelled to respond to the unwarranted outburst by Penang Chief Minister YB Lim Guan Eng on CAP's complaint on the lack of public consultation by the State Government on some recent mega projects.

The mega projects in question are the construction of a 6.5 km Gurney Drive-Bagan Ajam undersea tunnel, 12 km road connecting Tanjung Bungah-Teluk Bahang, 4.2 km Gurney Drive-Lebuhraya Tun Dr. Lim Chong Eu bypass and 4.6 km Lebuhraya Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu-Bandar Baru Air Itam bypass.
 
We reiterate our earlier press statement, namely, that there has been no public consultation on these mega projects.
 
CAP is shocked to note that both the Chief Minister and his Pegawai Khas Encik Zairil Khir Johari appear to have no understanding of the objects and process of public consultation.
 
Briefing NGOs generally on the mega projects and making statements about them to the press or in the State Assembly do not constitute public consultation.
 
Public consultation involves engaging the public at the earliest stage of the decision-making process, providing adequate information about the projects and giving due consideration to the representations and views made by individuals and civil society organisations. Such a process has not been adopted by the State Government with regard to the mega projects. A good example of public consultation is the ongoing process in developing a Transport Master Plan for Penang and the Special Area Plan for the Botanic Gardens.
 
The key question is: Before signing a Memorandum of Understanding and calling for request proposals for construction of these mega projects, was a preliminary study carried out with regard to the need for, and viability of, these projects, as well as their economic, social and environmental impacts? If such a study has been carried out, why was the information not shared with the public for them to make useful representations to the authorities? It would be disastrous to embark on these projects involving huge costs and serious economic, social and environmental impacts without such a study.
 
Encik Zairil gave reducing traffic congestion as the reason for implementing these mega projects. The State Government has already engaged consultants to prepare a Transport Master Plan, and the question arises as to why a decision was taken on these mega projects as a solution for traffic congestion even before the consultants had made their recommendations.
 
It is instructive to note that in response to press queries whether the projects were part of the Transport Master Plan, the Chief Minister responded by characterising these projects as a "bonus". The notion of a bonus is something that is additional to what has been agreed. Presumably, the Chief Minister has persuaded himself that he is giving the people of Penang a gift in addition to what they bargained for. That may very well be so, but the point is that this is effectively an admission that the projects were never part of the Transport Master Plan. The attempt to pass them off as a "bonus" cannot make them so.
 
If the government is serious about practising the CAT principle with regard to large public projects, then it should introduce and implement guidelines on public participation. The British government and, in Australia, State Governments have implemented such guidelines. The British guidelines provide that "formal consultation should take place at a stage when there is scope to influence the policy outcome".
 
CAP would like to emphasise that our comments and criticism of policies and projects are made solely in the public interest and not designed to advance any political or party interest. For over 45 years we have criticized, without fear or favour, projects and policies which do not bring long-term benefits to society and which have serious adverse social and environmental impacts. We will continue to do so.
 
In the interest of our people and nation, it is vital that Malaysian politicians, NGOs and the media should embrace a culture of debate and discussion in a spirit of mutual respect.  Most importantly, those who hold public office must always be prepared to accept public criticisms and respond to them with due decorum.
 
Press Statement - 12 March 2012

Folk living near the city and local non-governmental organisations are also dreading the new density guideline that allows each development to have up to 87 units per acre (0.4ha) and questioning why the state did not hold a public consultation on the matter



More than reduced use of plastic bags needed

0 comments

THERE have been many changes in Penang in the last four years and nine months. Some are nice and others, not so nice.

There have been more social and community programmes such as big cultural festivals going on in town on the weekends that draw people by the thousands.

Such activities have given new life to the inner city of George Town, which was once quite "dead" after office hours with people preferring to spend their time in malls.

There are also mass gotong-royong programmes on beaches and in the World Heritage Site.

More trees have been planted around the city in line with the state government's Cleaner and Greener Penang initiative.

The streets are also noticeably cleaner, but only on the island. The level of cleanliness on the mainland has been the same, more or less. The roadside landscaping and maintenance of public infrastructure there also need a lot of work.

With the focus on going green, plastic shopping bags in Penang are no longer free at malls, eateries and many other retail outlets that support the state's no plastic-bag initiative.

Plastic bags now cost 20 sen each for those who forget to bring along their own shopping bags.

It may take a while to see its positive effects but it is a good move to copy countries such as Japan, which introduced the move.

Bicycles are also back in fashion, even in Penang's hot and sometimes unpredictable weather. Some streets in the city have bicycle lanes, even though the roads are already a little narrow.

Cycling has gained enough popularity in recent times that many lucky draws come with at least a prize of one bicycle.

There are other changes that may have made some Penangites feel good about their state, like the free Wi-Fi (when it is accessible), the move to refurbish and rejuvenate the town's old icons such as Komtar and the Chowrasta Market, and the RM100 for senior citizens and newborn babies.

Although they are all good and popular, Penang seems to be still waiting for something bigger to happen -- a change so great that people will be saying "now that's what we were talking about".

Penang has not experienced anything like that yet, even though the people have heard enough about the vision for the state to become an international city and destination of choice for investors and the like.

Despite all those dreams, there is still no Local Plan to clearly map out and control development.

There is still no transport master plan in place to solve worsening traffic problems on the island.

There is also no blueprint to show how Penang will grow in the next few years. The best we have now seem to be drafts.

While the people wait for the plans, land is being used for new residential and commercial projects, including a number of posh ones that the average Penangite cannot afford.

The scenario has, of late, raised questions on who are buying up Penang's properties and for what purpose.

Folk living near the city and local non-governmental organisations are also dreading the new density guideline that allows each development to have up to 87 units per acre (0.4ha) and questioning why the state did not hold a public consultation on the matter.

They are also wondering which areas the guideline will apply to and whether the existing infrastructures, like roads and drainage systems, can support the increase in the population of people and cars.

There are many questions but few satisfying answers.

Things are not bad in Penang. They are just "lacking".

It will certainly takes much more than words, some nice little changes and a car-free Sundays to live up to the expectations of Penangites.



Read more: More than reduced use of plastic bags needed - Northern - New Straits Times http://www.nst.com.my/streets/northern/more-than-reduced-use-of-plastic-bags-needed-1.180144#ixzz2E88yssSF

Monday 26 November 2012

Thestar 261112 on 87 units per acre density

» MEMBER LOGIN  
   Property News -  

By WINNIE YEOH 
winnie@thestar.com.my | Nov 26, 2012

14 projects approved under density guideline


THE Penang Municipal Council (MPPP) has approved 14 projects under the 87 units per 0.404ha guideline since it came into effect in June, 2010.

State Local Government and Traffic Management Committee chairman Chow Kon Yeow said stringent measures had however been imposed on developers to build the increased density units.

"The guideline is not applicable in established housing areas, World Heritage Site, the area from Tanjung Bungah Hotel to Mar Vista, along Gurney Drive, the bordering areas of Air Putih constituency and Air Itam constituency and re-zoning area.

"The floor area for the guideline is also capped at about 1,400sq ft per unit and MPPP has also imposed a price control for 25% of the units," he said in a press conference at the City Hall in Esplanade yesterday. `

Of the 25%, Chow said developers would have to sell 5% of the units at RM200,000 per unit, 15% at RM300,000 per unit and 5% at RM400,000 per unit.

He said if a developer wished to build under the new guideline, the company would have to build an additional 30% low-cost or low medium-cost units in the same district.

"Developers will also have to submit a traffic impact assessment (TIA) report for the respective projects," he said.

Chow added that currently 109.26ha of land on Penang island was available for the building of units under the new guideline.

He said this worked out to 8,100 units at 30 units per 0.404ha and under the new guideline, 23,490 units could be built.

Council president Datuk Patahiyah Ismail, who was also present, said there would be no capped floor plan size if developers chose to build 30 units per 0.404ha.

"With the 87 units per 0.404ha guideline, we can in a way curb super condos and the issue of expensive prices," she said.

In recent news reports, many Penangites questioned the need for the guideline as they were concerned that higher density may lead to social and environmental problems for the existing residents.

The 14 projects which have been approved are in Jalan C.Y. Choy,

Jalan Macalister, Jalan Seang Teik, Lorong Perak, Sungai Ara, Bukit Gambier (two projects), Lembah Permai, Jalan Jelutong (two projects), Jalan Paya Terubong, Jalan Perak, Jalan Tanjung Tokong and Jalan Pantai Jerejak.


More property news:

LATEST NEWS / ARTICLES
26 Nov 2012 
14 projects approved under density guideline
26 Nov 2012 
Dubai plans new 'city', world's largest mall
26 Nov 2012 
Johor offers compensation following land acquisition award hearing
26 Nov 2012 
'Land to be offered to KLIDC if no payment'
26 Nov 2012 
Constituency grants can help rebuild homes of the poor, says Chor
OTHER INTERESTING NEWS / ARTICLES
»Drain serves no purpose 23 Jun 2011
» Ratings on PJH debt reaffirmed by MARC 27 Jan 2012
» Spoof on TNB has some riled up 29 Mar 2010
» Contemporary tropical mansion in Jakarta 20 Dec 2011
» Labuan UMS protest shows extent of water woes 08 Mar 2010
MOST VIEWED NEWS / ARTICLES
» Buyers turn to Kajang as KL home prices rise 27 Oct 2012
» First hypermarket in Malaysia 16 Nov 2012
» Spate of robberies at restaurants in Klang Valley 30 Oct 2012
» New shopping centres to be in Cheras, KL Sentral, Kota Damansara and Cyberjaya 19 Nov 2012
» Is paying off a property loan as quickly as possible a wise move? 19 Nov 2012

 

Site Map  |  FAQ  |  Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use  |  Write To Us  |  Advertise With Us 

StarProperty Sdn. Bhd. (Co. No.708369-V) is an MSC status company 
wholly owned by Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd. 

All rights reserved. Copyright © 1995-2012 Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd (Co No 10894-D). 



 

CHINAPRESS 261112 ON 87 UNITS PER ACRE DENSITY

每英畝87單位房屋密度政策 4類別範圍區沒牽涉

 (檳城25日訊)檳州地方政府委員會主席曹觀友宣布,世遺區、遊客區、低密度住宅區、用途轉換地段等地區,不受"每英畝87單位房屋密度"政策影響。

 丹絨武雅海灘酒店至Mar Vista一帶、遊客區如新關仔角、阿逸布爹及亞依淡州選區的分界線一帶不受影響,后者接近升旗山及極樂寺等旅遊景點。

 此外,涉及轉換用途的土地,如農業用途轉為房屋用途后,不能申請提升密度至每英畝87單位。

 從2010年6月28日執行至今,共有14項房屋計劃在此政策下獲批准,另有17項申請在審核中。

 曹觀友說,"每英畝87單位房屋密度"政策只適用于,原本密度為每英畝30單位的中等密度住宅區。

讓購屋者有各選擇

 他今早在檳島市政廳召開記者會時,這么說。在場者包括檳市局主席拿督巴達雅、代秘書邱寶益、建築部主任尤端祥及發展規劃部主任羅斯蘭等。

 他說,符合"每英畝87單位房屋密度"政策的房屋計劃,受限最高興建面積為12萬2000平方尺。

 "上述政策旨在鼓勵興建更多可負擔房屋、讓不同需求購屋者有各種選擇,及讓發展商在興建房屋時能平衡,不只專注在豪華公寓。"

 他說,在每英畝87單位密度政策下的房屋計劃中,25%單位價格受控制,每單位最高售價為40萬令吉(5%單位)、30萬令吉(15%單位)及20萬令吉(5%單位)。

 有關房屋計劃也必須負責在同一個縣興建30%廉價屋或中廉價屋、興建社區基本設施及泊車位,及交通影響評估報告獲批准。

巴達雅:拜吉路高樓計劃 沒呈策劃書不獲批

巴達雅說,早前引起爭議的拜吉路高樓計劃沒提呈策劃書,因此並未被批准。

 她說,發展商不能申請,將已成形(established)的住宅區提高密度至每英畝87單位。

 前年7月,發展商在未獲市政局批准下拆除位于拜吉路的許心美豪宅地段,該地段被指將興建高密度高樓計劃,引起當地居民反對。

 曹觀友也說,自1994年5月1日開始,中廉價屋計劃的密度可達每英畝120單位,其中一例為五條路斯里紹佳娜組屋。

 他說,就算是在前朝時期,每英畝60單位的房屋計劃,也可申請增加30%,但當時沒引起太多爭議。

檳島20年內增逾萬房屋

曹觀友說,在"每英畝87單位房屋密度"的政策下,未來20年內,270英畝檳島中等密度住宅區將增加最多1萬5360個房屋單位。

 "若以原有每英畝30單位計算,上述地段將興建最多8100單位,若申請提高密度至每英畝87單位,將可興建最多2萬3490單位,意味著增加1萬5360個房屋單位,或每年增加768單位。"

 受上述政策影響的270英畝地段,佔檳島土地0.37%,該政策也沒限制可申請提高密度至87單位的土地的最低面積。

 "若該土地為0.5英畝,就可興建43單位,以此類推。"

 曹觀友說,早在上述政策推行前,已有可提高密度至每英畝60單位,甚至100單位(包括土著額外允許單位)的先例。

檳島市政局依據"每英畝87單位房屋密度"
批准的房屋計劃所在地(2010年6月28日至)

  1.崔耀才路

  2.中路

  3.祥德路

  4.霹靂冷

  5.新港

  6.甘密山(2計劃)

  7.柏邁谷

  8.日落洞路(2計劃)

  9.壟尾路

 10.大路后

 11.丹絨道光路

 12.班台惹雅路

訂閱報紙

有興趣訂閱中國報者,請致電Mr Lim Ying Kiang (019-2608077) 或電郵 yklim@chinapress.com.my





87 units per acre housing density the policy 4 categories range is not involved

 The announced (Penang, the 25th) Penang Local Government Committee Chairman Caoguan You areas of the World Heritage area, tourist areas, low density residential uses conversion lot, not subject to the policy implications of the "housing density of 87 units per acre.

 Dan the velvet Wu Yahai Beach Hotel to the Mar Vista area, tourist areas such as the the New Gurney, of Ah Yat cloth father and Asia in accordance with pale State constituency boundaries along the unaffected, which is close to attractions such as Penang Hill and Kek Lok Si Temple.

 In addition, involving the conversion of use of land, such as agricultural use converted to residential use, not application to enhance density to 87 units per acre.

 From June 28, 2010 execution date, a total of 14 housing projects approved under this policy, and another 17 applications in an audit.

 Caoguan You say, "housing density of 87 units per acre" policy only applies to the original density per acre, 30 units of medium-density residential area.

Allow homebuyers the choice

 He held a press conference in Penang Island City Hall this morning, so to speak. Those present included Penang PUC main 席拿督巴达雅 on behalf of the Secretary of Qiubao Yi the construction director You Duanxiang and director of the Planning and Development Department Roseland.

 He said that, in line with the policy of "housing density of 87 units per acre housing program, limited the maximum construction area of ​​122,000 square feet.

 "The policy aims to encourage the construction of more affordable housing, various options for the different needs of homebuyers and developers for housing balance, not just focus on luxury apartments."

 He said, controlled housing program under 87 units per acre density policy, 25% of the unit price, the highest per unit price of RM10, 400,000 (5% of the units), RM300, 000 (15% of the units) and RM200, 000 (5% of the units.)

 In housing projects must also be responsible for 30% of low-cost housing or in low-cost housing built in the same county, and the construction of community infrastructure and parking spaces, and traffic impact assessment report approved.

Pattaya: the Baiji Road tall buildings plan approved did was planning book

Pattaya, the earlier controversy Baiji Road high-rise plan did not present planning book, and therefore has not been approved.

 She said that the developer can not apply for the residential area forming (established) to increase the density to 87 units per acre.

 In July of the previous year, the developers removed without Council approval Xu heart US mansion in Baiji Road, Lot, accusations that the lot will be the construction of high-density high-rise plan, opposition from local residents.

 Caoguan You also said that since May 1, 1994, the density of low-cost housing scheme of up to 120 units per acre, in one case for five Lusi Li Shao Jianuo HDB.

 He said, can apply even in the period of the former administration, the housing program of 60 units per acre, an increase of 30%, but did not cause too much controversy.

Penang Island, a 20-year increase Yu Wan housing

Caoguan You said that, under the policy of the housing density of 87 units per acre, in the next 20 years, 270 acres of medium-density residential area in Penang Island will increase by up to 15,360 housing units.

 "In terms of per acre of the original 30 units, the lot will be built up to 8100 units, if the application to increase the density to 87 units per acre, will be the construction of up to 23,490 units, means an increase of 15,360 housing units, or yearly increase in 768 units. "

 The policy implications Lot 270 acres of land in Penang Island 0.37%, the policy did not limit the application to increase the density to a minimum of 87 units of land area.

 "If the land is 0.5 acres, you can build 43 units, and so on."

 Caoguan You said that, prior to the implementation of the above policy, there can improve the density to 60 units per acre, or 100 units (including indigenous additional allow units) precedent.

Penang Island Municipal Council pursuant to 87 units per acre housing density 
housing plan approved location to (June 28, 2010)

  Choi Yiu before Road

  2 Middle Road

  3. Cheung Tak Road

  . Thunderbolt cold.

  5 Newport

  6. Gan Mishan Project (2)

  7 Michael Barbalas Valley

  8 Jelutong Road Project (2)

  9. Lung Mei Road

 10. Parkway after

 Tanjung Daoguang Road, 11.

 12 Pantai provoke Nga Road

Subscribe to the newspaper

Subscribe to Chinese newspaper, please call of Mr Lim Ying Kiang (019-2608077) or e-mailyklim@chinapress.com.my